Procuratorial Daily how much temperance official reception itself should be banned — Henan branch n-gamelink

Procuratorial Daily: how much temperance official reception itself should prohibit — Henan branch network recently, Xinjiang issued regulations, requiring all the official reception within the autonomous region are prohibited drinking. And reporters combed found that nearly two years, Zhejiang, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Jiangsu, Hunan, Anhui and other provinces have introduced official reception "temperance" provisions, regardless of lunch and dinner are prohibited (September 29th Beijing News). The so-called "no drinking" means that all persons are not allowed to drink any liquor provided by any person or any unit." Check around the prohibition, are not difficult to realize a strict word. The public, of course, is a piece of applause. But why temperance? It’s not a matter of no importance. Clear dry reason, to study the effect of post prohibition. In ancient times, temperance was to save grain. Why should the public reception be strictly forbidden to drink? Certainly not for the sake of saving food, nor will it be to make the family no longer addicted to alcohol". Official receptions prohibit alcohol drinking. In addition to affecting work and influencing the image, the most important consideration should be to save money. Knowing this, discuss the prohibition is good to be targeted. The official reception "binge" has always been criticized. In this regard, the country has not been less policy. Unfortunately, there are Countermeasures under the policy, from "four dishes and one soup" to Moutai into plastic bottles, farmhouse sauna, are very typical examples. The cage system, "cage eye" should be tightly woven more dense; the prohibition is necessary to weave dense official reception "cage eye". Drinks fee has been the largest official reception, once exposed unit purchase Moutai money, are very amazing figures. The problem is, the prohibition of the implementation effect, need to be tested, similar to the "Moutai put into plastic bottles", "innovation" will emerge in an endless stream? But the key is the introduction of the prohibition is to save money based on the local implementation of prohibition are likely to implement into form of prohibition, not necessarily reduce the cost. If the implementation of the prohibition seems very good, the official reception of the money but a lot of this prohibition still is not successful. The official reception should save money. Besides temperance, it is more necessary and should be forbidden to receive. "Last year, I only asked for a trip with public funds.". There was a seminar in Denmark, and several European Union officials had a good relationship with our city. I asked them to have a meal at a very ordinary street restaurant." Norway city mayor China Katz Mo hosted Xinhua News Agency reporters, just a cup of coffee, a few cookies. In Canada, the lower level departments have no responsibility, and there is no funds for the accommodation and reception of the visiting officials. A government fee is only used to meet the qualified person outside the government. In contrast, our official reception is obviously too frequent, let the "bare sun" official reception of the White House in the grass-roots areas overwhelmed. Compared with prohibition, this is the real problem: strictly prohibit the official reception of the official reception. From the inter city traffic to the city traffic, from accommodation to food expenses, travel regulations have a clear reimbursement standards, why there is a huge amount of local?

检察日报:多少禁酒的公务接待本身就该禁–河南分网–人民网   近日,新疆发布规定,要求在自治区范围内的所有公务接待一律禁止饮酒。而记者梳理发现,近两年,浙江、黑龙江、吉林、江苏、湖南、安徽等省份均已出台公务接待“禁酒”规定,不分午餐晚餐一律禁酒(9月29日《新京报》)。   “所谓一律不准饮酒,是指一律不得饮用任何人和任何单位提供的任何酒类。”查看各地禁酒令,都不难体会到一个严字。对此,公众当然是一片掌声。但是,为什么要禁酒呢?这并不是无关紧要的问题。搞清楚禁酒的原因,才能事后考察禁酒令的效果。   古代禁酒是要节约粮食,如今公务接待为何要严禁饮酒呢?肯定不会是出于节约粮食的目的,大概也不会是要“使家庭中不再有沉湎于酒精的父亲”。公务接待禁止饮酒,除了影响工作、影响形象之外,最主要的考虑应该是节约开支。明乎此,讨论禁酒令好不好才算有的放矢。   公务接待“大吃大喝”历来备受诟病。对此,一直以来国家没少出台政策。只可惜,“上有政策下有对策”,从“四菜一汤”到茅台装进塑料瓶、农家院里洗桑拿,都是很典型的例子。制度的笼子,“笼眼”应该编织得密些再密些;禁酒令是织密公务接待“笼眼”的必要。酒水费一直是公务接待中的大头,曾经曝光过的单位团购茅台的钱,都是很惊人的数字。   可问题在于,禁酒令的执行效果,有待实践检验,类似“茅台装进塑料瓶”的“创新”,会否层出不穷?更关键的是,出台禁酒令是基于省钱的目的,地方落实禁酒令却很可能落实成形式上的禁酒,费用并不见得减少。如果禁酒令执行貌似很不错,结果公务接待的钱却一分也不少,这样的禁酒令仍然算不得成功。   公务接待要省钱,除了禁酒,更有必要的,应该是禁接待。“去年一年,我只用公款请过一次客。那次是在丹麦开研讨会,有几个欧盟官员与我们市有良好的合作关系。我请他们到一家很普通的街边饭店吃了一顿饭。”挪威斯凯兹莫市市长招待中国新华社记者的,只是一杯咖啡、几片饼干。   而在加拿大,下级部门没有责任,也没有经费安排来访上级官员的食宿接待,一个政府的招待费仅用于接待政府以外符合条件的人。相比之下,我们的公务接待显然过于频繁了,让曾经“裸晒”公务接待账本的白庙乡这样的基层地方不堪重负。相比禁酒,这才是真正的问题:严禁不该公务接待的公务接待。   从城市间交通到市内交通,从住宿费到伙食费,差旅费规定都有明确的报销标准,地方上为何还有数额庞大的公务接待费呢?公务接待费和差旅费,是否存在相当部分的重叠?会不会同一次出差行为,既在出差单位按差旅费报销,又在接待单位按公务招待支出?既有差旅费,何须招待费?   明确公务接待的界定规则、适合接待的对象和情况、接待计划的事先审批及费用报销程序,这才是最重要的。公务接待需要有细致入微的严格管理。那些禁酒的公务接待,大多数本身就该被严禁。 (责编:王佩、杨晓娜)相关的主题文章: